Saturday 30 January 2010

Love Scams Again: Over the Net

Another love scam started on YM.


But for her to pose naked in front of a webcam for online boyfriend, that is totally reckless.


The parcel trick should be obvious by now. A number of similar cases has been reported in newspaper.




KUALA LUMPUR: A consultant is worried that nude photos taken by her online boyfriend will be posted on the Web.
Annie, 32, had a relationship with the man, known as William Bobby Madoff, since March last year.
They got to know each other through Yahoo messenger.
Although they have never met, Annie claims to have fallen deeply in love with William, so much so that when he pestered her to pose naked in front of the webcam, she agreed.
Annie was speaking at a press conference organised by the MCA Complaints and Public Services Department here yesterday.
Two months later, Annie said she received an e-mail from William, asking how she wanted to settle the matter of the nude photos.
She decided to ignore it as she had broken up with William.
Last Wednesday, however, she received a message via Yahoo messenger from William.
He claimed to know her whereabouts and threatened to post the nude photos on the Internet soon.
Annie immediately lodged a police report and sought help from MCA Complaints and Public Services Department chief Datuk Michael Chong.
She said that in April last year, William told her to expect a package containing valuables such as a handphone, a laptop and some jewellery.
However, a week later, someone claiming to be from a billing department in Sabah called and asked her to pay RM3,880 for delivery of the package.
“I contacted William to clarify about the payment. He told me he had paid the charges in his country, but was unaware there were other charges to pay in Malaysia.
“He urged me to pay because the package was very valuable.”
She banked in the money but a few hours later, quickly cancelled the transaction.
Annie has since changed her phone number and e-mail address.
Chong urged chatroom users not to fall for the many scams on the Internet and advised victims to lodge police reports.

Friday 22 January 2010

September 11, 2001

Here he goes again.
And here I go ... you can say I have been watching to many spy movies but then, TRUTH has always been STRANGER than fiction, no?
I have yet to watch Avatar, though.


1. In my speech at the conference on the support for Palestine (Al Quds) on Jan 20, 2010, I said that if they can make the film Avatar, they can stage the attack and collapse of the World Trade Centre in New York.

2. The press report seems to suggest that there was no real destruction of the two towers but it was just some kind of theatrical trick. It is of course a fact that the two towers were destroyed after two aircrafts crashed into them.

3. A lot of people in America (the apologists will dismiss them as conspiracy theorists) questioned whether the towers collapsed because the planes crashed into them or that something else caused them to come down. These people have reproduced videos taken by media people showing the attack and the collapse of the towers, pointing out certain peculiar features. I have seen the three-hour long video which is widely distributed.

4. Those people who watched the live telecast of the attack and the collapse of the towers will remember as I remember, that both towers collapsed straight down, floor upon floor. They did not lean to their sides as they collapse. The manner of their collapse was like the pictures we see of multi-storied buildings being demolished by demolition experts. When demolishing a skyscraper in a built-up area the experts ensure that as the towers collapse they would not lean to the side and strike neighbouring buildings.

5. The collapse of the two towers was typical of demolition of skyscrapers by experts in America. It was too clean, each tower collapsing upon itself, not touching each other or the buildings surrounding them.

6. One thing that is never mentioned almost is the collapse of a third building which was neither hit by aircraft or by the two towers. This building, described as building number 7, is slightly more than half the height of the WTC towers.

7. This building also collapsed down upon itself. Again it looked like a demolition job. Why did it collapse? Nothing struck it. It did not catch fire. Yet it collapsed straight down without touching any other building or the towers.

8. The American investigators also showed pictures of the Pentagon where the third aircraft was supposed to have crashed into. There was no aircraft or debris. I have never seen the picture of the crashed aircraft.

9. Nor have I seen pictures of the fourth aircraft which crashed somewhere. Maybe others have seen pictures of these two crashed aircrafts. I would like to see them.

10. The American media work very fast. They are usually on the crash scenes minutes after the accident. Yet I do not remember seeing pictures of the crashed aircrafts which were supposed to hit the Pentagon and the one which crashed somewhere.

11. In the video structural engineers and other experts were asked to comment. They doubted that the twin towers collapsed because the aircrafts crashed into the upper stories.

12. I met a janitor who worked on the staff of the two towers. He helped to rescue a lot of people before the building came down. He was proclaimed a national hero. However, the official report did not carry his statement that there were explosions in the building which appeared to be quite unrelated to the plane crash.

13. As I said in my speech I am not so certain now that the Arab "terrorists" hijacked four commercial aircrafts simultaneously and flew them into the twin towers, the Pentagon and somewhere unknown (farm).

14. Some people have condemned me for doubting that the attack was mounted by Arab Muslim terrorists.

15. Perhaps one of the television stations would care to air the videos mentioned without censorship.

16. I really feel sorry for the consultant who profusely apologised for the Americans and the Jews. He should learn to be honest to himself. I pray that his services would be recognised and appreciated by his principals.